A Double-Edged Sword: Thioxanthenes Act on Both the Mind and the Microbiome.

The rising tide of antibacterial drug resistance has given rise to the virtual elimination of numerous erstwhile antibiotics, intensifying the urgent demand for novel agents. A number of drugs have been found to possess potent antimicrobial action during the past several years and have the potential to supplement or even replace the antibiotics. Many of these 'non-antibiotics', as they are referred to, belong to the widely used class of neuroleptics, the phenothiazines. Another chemically and pharmacologically related class is the thioxanthenes, differing in that the aromatic N of the central phenothiazine ring has been replaced by a C atom. Such "carbon-analogues" were primarily synthesized with the hope that these would be devoid of some of the toxic effects of phenothiazines. Intensive studies on syntheses, as well as chemical and pharmacological properties of thioxanthenes, were initiated in the late 1950s. Although a rather close parallelism with respect to structure activity relationships could be observed between phenothiazines and thioxanthenes; several thioxanthenes were synthesized in pharmaceutical industries and applied for human use as neuroleptics. Antibacterial activities of thioxanthenes came to be recognized in the early 1980s in Europe. During the following years, many of these drugs were found not only to be antibacterial agents but also to possess anti-mycobacterial, antiviral (including anti-HIV and anti-SARS-CoV-2) and anti-parasitic properties. Thus, this group of drugs, which has an inhibitory effect on the growth of a wide variety of microorganisms, needs to be explored for syntheses of novel antimicrobial agents. The purpose of this review is to summarize the neuroleptic and antimicrobial properties of this exciting group of bioactive molecules with a goal of identifying potential structures worthy of future exploration.

The neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19: Interactions with psychiatric illness and pharmacological treatment.

The recent outbreak of the corona virus disease (COVID-19) has had major global impact. The relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection and psychiatric diseases is of great concern, with an evident link between corona virus infections and various central and peripheral nervous system manifestations. Unmitigated neuro-inflammation has been noted to underlie not only the severe respiratory complications of the disease but is also present in a range of neuro-psychiatric illnesses. Several neurological and psychiatric disorders are characterized by immune-inflammatory states, while treatments for these disorders have distinct anti-inflammatory properties and effects. With inflammation being a common contributing factor in SARS-CoV-2, as well as psychiatric disorders, treatment of either condition may affect disease progression of the other or alter response to pharmacological treatment. In this review, we elucidate how viral infections could affect pre-existing psychiatric conditions and how pharmacological treatments of these conditions may affect overall progress and outcome in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. We address whether any treatment-induced benefits and potential adverse effects may ultimately affect the overall treatment approach, considering the underlying dysregulated neuro-inflammatory processes and potential drug interactions. Finally, we suggest adjunctive treatment options for SARS-CoV-2-associated neuro-psychiatric symptoms.

Screened antipsychotic drugs inhibit SARS-CoV-2 binding with ACE2 in vitro.

AIM: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has swept the globe and no specific effective drug has been identified. Drug repurposing is a well-known method to address the crisis in a time-critical fashion. Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) have been reported to inhibit DNA replication of hepatitis B virus, measles virus germination, and HIV infection, along with replication of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, both of which interact with host cells as SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Nineteen APDs were screened using ACE2-HEK293T cell membrane chromatography (ACE2-HEK293T/CMC). Cytotoxicity assay, coronavirus spike pseudotype virus entry assay, surface plasmon resonance, and virtual molecular docking were applied to detect affinity between ACE2 protein and drugs and a potential antiviral property of the screened compounds. KEY FINDINGS: After the CMC screening, 8 of the 19 APDs were well-retained on ACE2-HEK293T/CMC column and showed significant antiviral activities in vitro. Three quarters of them belong to phenothiazine and could significantly inhibit the entrance of coronavirus into ACE2-HEK293T cells. Aother two drugs, aripiprazole and tiapride, exhibited weaker inhibition. We selected five of the drugs for subsequent evaluation. All five showed similar affinity to ACE2 and virtual molecular docking demonstrated they bound with different amino acids respectively on ACE2 which SARS-CoV-2 binds to. SIGNIFICANCE: Eight APDs were screened for binding with ACE2, five of which demonstrated potential protective effects against SARS-CoV-2 through acting on ACE2. Although the five drugs have a weak ability to block SARS-CoV-2 with a single binding site, they may provide a synergistic effect in adjuvant therapy of COVID-19 infection.

Antiviral activity of chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, perphenazine, prochlorperazine, and thioridazine towards RNA-viruses. A review.

In 2020 the whole world focused on antivirus drugs towards SARS-CoV-2. Most of the researchers focused on drugs used in other viral infections or malaria. We have not seen such mobilization towards one topic in this century. The whole situation makes clear that progress needs to be made in antiviral drug development. The first step to do it is to characterize the potential antiviral activity of new or already existed drugs on the market. Phenothiazines are antipsychotic agents used previously as antiseptics, anthelminthics, and antimalarials. Up to date, they are tested for a number of other disorders including the broad spectrum of viruses. The goal of this paper was to summarize the current literature on activity toward RNA-viruses of such drugs like chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, perphenazine, prochlorperazine, and thioridazine. We identified 49 papers, where the use of the phenothiazines for 23 viruses from different families were tested. Chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, perphenazine, prochlorperazine, and thioridazine possess anti-viral activity towards different types of viruses. These drugs inhibit clathrin-dependent endocytosis, cell-cell fusion, infection, replication of the virus, decrease viral invasion as well as suppress entry into the host cells. Additionally, since the drugs display activity at nontoxic concentrations they have therapeutic potential for some viruses, still, further research on animal and human subjects are needed in this field to verify cell base research.